One application of organic chemistry that you can (and should)
perform throughout your life is to critically evaluate the chemistry
that goes on around you every day. This particular assignment
focuses on chemical reactions, many of which have become so common
that we all tend to forget that they are chemistry at all. The
chemicals used to perform these reactions are chosen based on
chemical reactivity and physical properties, both of which depend
on chemical structure. This assignment, therefore, should provide
you with a focus for synthesizing material from the entire semester
Your assignment is outlined below.
Incremental Deadlines:
This assignment is frequently challenging for many students as
the focus of the paper (reaction classification and analysis)
is NOT available in reference books. For that reason, elements
of the paper will be due in stages, with feedback at each stage.
The following items (and the points awarded at each increment)
are shown below:
| Reaction Equation | 15 points | June 22 |
| Reaction Impact | 15 points | June 24 |
| Reaction Classification | 20 points | June 26 |
| Structural Analysis of Starting Materials | 20 points | June 29 |
| Paper | 200 points | July 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 30 points | July 2 |
KEY ELEMENTS: Provides a detailed (and correct) explanation of the reaction type
Explains WHY the reaction is classified that way
Correctly identifies structural characteristics that confer this reactivity
Explains WHY these structural characteristics confer this type of reactivity
SECONDARY ELEMENTS: Gives an introduction that indicates the everyday importance of the reaction.
Reaction is organic
Focuses on a single reaction rather than a net reaction
Includes correct representation of the reaction
Reads clearly (occasional errors acceptable if they do not distract
from the content)
Characteristics of a 4.0 paper: (184-200 point range)
Contains all key and secondary elements
Characteristics of a 3.5 paper: (175-183 point range)
Key and secondary elements present - some detail lacking in explanation
of one element
Characteristics of a 3.0 paper: (164-174 point range)
Missing secondary element
AND/OR
some detail lacking in explanation of one or two key elements,
but analysis still correct
Characteristics of a 2.5 paper: (153-163 point range)
Several secondary elements (2-3) not satisfied
OR
some errors in a key element
Characteristics of a 2.0 paper: (144-152 point range)
Several secondary elements (2-3) not satisfied
AND
some errors in a key element
Characteristics of a 1.5 paper: (135-143 point range)
A key element missing
OR
most (4-5) secondary elements not satisfied
OR
Errors in more than one key element
Characteristics of a 1.0 paper: (124-134 point range)
A key element missing
AND
most (4-5) secondary elements not satisfied
OR
Two missing key elements
Characteristics of a 0.0 paper: (0-123 point range)
There's a paper with a name on it, but it's not clear that person knew what the assigment was.