Final Examination Writing Assignment - CEM143

Summer Semester 1998

One application of organic chemistry that you can (and should) perform throughout your life is to critically evaluate the chemistry that goes on around you every day. This particular assignment focuses on chemical reactions, many of which have become so common that we all tend to forget that they are chemistry at all. The chemicals used to perform these reactions are chosen based on chemical reactivity and physical properties, both of which depend on chemical structure. This assignment, therefore, should provide you with a focus for synthesizing material from the entire semester Your assignment is outlined below.

Incremental Deadlines:

This assignment is frequently challenging for many students as the focus of the paper (reaction classification and analysis) is NOT available in reference books. For that reason, elements of the paper will be due in stages, with feedback at each stage. The following items (and the points awarded at each increment) are shown below:
Reaction Equation15 pointsJune 22
Reaction Impact15 pointsJune 24
Reaction Classification20 pointsJune 26
Structural Analysis of Starting Materials20 pointsJune 29
Paper200 pointsJuly 1
Peer Evaluation30 pointsJuly 2

Grading Criteria

KEY ELEMENTS: Provides a detailed (and correct) explanation of the reaction type

Explains WHY the reaction is classified that way

Correctly identifies structural characteristics that confer this reactivity

Explains WHY these structural characteristics confer this type of reactivity

SECONDARY ELEMENTS: Gives an introduction that indicates the everyday importance of the reaction.

Reaction is organic

Focuses on a single reaction rather than a net reaction

Includes correct representation of the reaction

Reads clearly (occasional errors acceptable if they do not distract from the content)

Characteristics of a 4.0 paper: (184-200 point range)

Contains all key and secondary elements

Characteristics of a 3.5 paper: (175-183 point range)

Key and secondary elements present - some detail lacking in explanation of one element

Characteristics of a 3.0 paper: (164-174 point range)

Missing secondary element

AND/OR

some detail lacking in explanation of one or two key elements, but analysis still correct

Characteristics of a 2.5 paper: (153-163 point range)

Several secondary elements (2-3) not satisfied

OR

some errors in a key element

Characteristics of a 2.0 paper: (144-152 point range)

Several secondary elements (2-3) not satisfied

AND

some errors in a key element

Characteristics of a 1.5 paper: (135-143 point range)

A key element missing

OR

most (4-5) secondary elements not satisfied

OR

Errors in more than one key element

Characteristics of a 1.0 paper: (124-134 point range)

A key element missing

AND

most (4-5) secondary elements not satisfied

OR

Two missing key elements

Characteristics of a 0.0 paper: (0-123 point range)

There's a paper with a name on it, but it's not clear that person knew what the assigment was.